Home > Public Policy > Taxes
Transportation is a major source of greenhouse gasses - this is a market externality. To counter this, the gasoline tax incentivizes less driving and more electric vehicles.
Fuel Economy standards are a regulation that provide a minimum bar, but do not incentivize vehicle manufacturers to over-achieve like the gas tax does.
Instruments are pretty straight-forward:
But typology is a different method of categorization.
Both the costs and benefits of a policy could be concentrated among a specific group, or dispersed among everyone.
Name of policy type
Maybe some more information here.
Interest group politics
In which both groups are identifiable.
Entrepreneurial Politics
From some, to many.
Convincing policy makers to take action for the public good, against the wishes of a small group.
Client Politics
Let’s subsidize the corn farmers.
Majoritarian Politics
Everyone pays for the military, which benefits everyone.
A tax on polluting industries, goes to a fund. Used to clean superfund sites.
Since the cost-bearing group is clearly identifiable, and the benefiting group is identifiable, this could be said to be:
Since it protects the public from market problems, (pollution is an externality), it could also be a “Protective Regulatory” policy.
Since the cost-bearing and benefiting groups are clearly identifiable, this is:
On a supply-demand curve, there is the Equilibrium Price and Equilibrium Quantity.
When taxes are added, there is a difference between what consumers pay and what producers get.
Taxes shift one curve by the amount of the tax. It could shift either supply or demand, both give the same results.
Here’s a diagram:
Wait, here’s a better diagram:
In a perfectly competitive market, taxes cause dead weight loss.
Meanwhile, if there are market failures (negative externality), a tax can compensate for those.